+1 for internal configuration to reduce the complexity. We can externalize it if we have some requirements in the future.
Thanks. Luke On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 2:13 AM David Jacot <david.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds good. Thanks, Justine. > > Le ven. 19 août 2022 à 19:38, Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io.invalid > > > a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > Followed up with David and Ismael offline. > > Ismael explained that we probably don't want to increase complexity and > > didn't think the value needed to be modified beyond tests. I agree with > > this so I've decided to go with an internal configuration (with the same > > default as mentioned above). > > > > From a user's perspective, there will be no change. Because this is > > internal, we decided to keep the name the internal variable used. > > > > Let me know if anyone has any further concerns. > > Thanks, > > Justine > > >
