Hello.

Sorry, but it seems we should fix KIP numbering.
KIP-865 [1] is another KIP :).

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-865%3A+Support+--bootstrap-server+in+kafka-streams-application-reset

> 9 сент. 2022 г., в 19:38, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> написал(а):
> 
> Thanks for this KIP, David!
> 
> In the "motivation" section, it might help to give a concrete example of an 
> operation we want to be atomic. My favorite one is probably CreateTopics 
> since it's easy to see that we want to create all of a topic or none of it, 
> and a topic could be a potentially unbounded number of records (although 
> hopefully people have reasonable create topic policy classes in place...)
> 
> In "broker support", it would be good to clarify that we will buffer the 
> records in the MetadataDelta and not publish a new MetadataImage until the 
> transaction is over. This is an implementation detail, but it's a simple one 
> and I think it will make it easier to understand how this works.
> 
> In the "Raft Transactions" section of "Rejected Alternatives," I'd add that 
> managing buffering in the Raft layer would be a lot less efficient than doing 
> it in the controller / broker layer. We would end up accumulating big lists 
> of records which would then have to be applied when the transaction 
> completed, rather than building up a MetadataDelta (or updating the 
> controller state) incrementally.
> 
> Maybe we want to introduce the concept of "last stable offset" to be the last 
> committed offset that is NOT part of an ongoing transaction? Just a 
> nomenclature suggestion...
> 
> best,
> Colin
> 
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022, at 06:42, David Arthur wrote:
>> Hey folks, I'd like to start a discussion on the idea of adding
>> transactions in the KRaft controller. This will allow us to overcome
>> the current limitation of atomic batch sizes in Raft which lets us do
>> things like create topics with a huge number of partitions.
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-865+Metadata+Transactions
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> David

Reply via email to