Hi all,

Thank you to Federico for testing out and voting on the release!

Due to a number of recently-raised-and-fixed issues, we have decided to
abandon this release candidate and publish a new one with some extra fixes
included.

I am cancelling this vote thread and aim to open a new one for RC1 sometime
today or tomorrow.

Cheers,

Chris

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 8:26 AM Federico Valeri <fedeval...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi, I did the following to validate the release:
>
> - Checksums and signatures ok
> - Build from source using Java 17 and Scala 2.13 ok
> - Unit and integration tests ok
> - Quickstart in both ZK and KRaft modes ok
> - Test app with staging Maven artifacts ok
>
> Documentation still has 3.3.1 version references, but I guess this
> will be updated later.
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks
> Fede
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 11:51 AM jacob bogers <jkfbog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I have tried several times to unsub from dev@kafka.apache.org, but
> it
> > just isnt working
> >
> > Can someone help me?
> >
> > cheers
> > Jacob
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:37 PM Chris Egerton <chr...@aiven.io.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
> > >
> > > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 3.3.2.
> > >
> > > This is a bugfix release with several fixes since the release of
> 3.3.1. A
> > > few of the major issues include:
> > >
> > > * KAFKA-14358 Users should not be able to create a regular topic name
> > > __cluster_metadata
> > > KAFKA-14379 Consumer should refresh preferred read replica on update
> > > metadata
> > > * KAFKA-13586 Prevent exception thrown during connector update from
> > > crashing distributed herder
> > >
> > >
> > > Release notes for the 3.3.2 release:
> > > https://home.apache.org/~cegerton/kafka-3.3.2-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote by Tuesday, December 20, 10pm UTC
> > >
> > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> > >
> > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> > > https://home.apache.org/~cegerton/kafka-3.3.2-rc0/
> > >
> > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
> > >
> > > * Javadoc:
> > > https://home.apache.org/~cegerton/kafka-3.3.2-rc0/javadoc/
> > >
> > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 3.3 branch) is the 3.3.2 tag:
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/3.3.2-rc0
> > >
> > > * Documentation:
> > > https://kafka.apache.org/33/documentation.html
> > >
> > > * Protocol:
> > > https://kafka.apache.org/33/protocol.html
> > >
> > > The most recent build has had test failures. These all appear to be
> due to
> > > flakiness, but it would be nice if someone more familiar with the
> failed
> > > tests could confirm this. I may update this thread with passing build
> links
> > > if I can get one, or start a new release vote thread if test failures
> must
> > > be addressed beyond re-running builds until they pass.
> > >
> > > Unit/integration tests:
> > >
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/3.3/135/testReport/
> > >
> > > System tests:
> > >
> > >
> http://confluent-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/system-test-kafka-branch-builder--1670984851--apache--3.3--22af3f29ce/2022-12-13--001./2022-12-13--001./report.html
> > > (initial with three flaky failures)
> > > Follow-up system tests:
> > >
> https://home.apache.org/~cegerton/system_tests/2022-12-14--015/report.html
> > > ,
> > >
> https://home.apache.org/~cegerton/system_tests/2022-12-14--016/report.html
> > > ,
> > >
> > >
> http://confluent-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/system-test-kafka-branch-builder--1671061000--apache--3.3--69fbaf2457/2022-12-14--001./2022-12-14--001./report.html
> > >
> > > (Note that the exact commit used for some of the system test runs will
> not
> > > precisely match the commit for the release candidate, but that all
> > > differences between those two commits should have no effect on the
> > > relevance or accuracy of the test results.)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
>

Reply via email to