Hi all,

Thanks to José for running the system tests, and to Bruno for verifying the
results!

With that, I'm closing the vote. The RC has passed with the required number
of votes. I'll be sending out a results announcement shortly.

Cheers,

Chris

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 6:19 AM Bruno Cadonna <cado...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Chris and José,
>
> I think the issue is not Streams related but has to do with the
> following commit:
>
> commit b66af662e61082cb8def576ded1fe5cee37e155f (HEAD, tag: 3.3.2-rc1)
> Author: Chris Egerton <chr...@aiven.io>
> Date:   Wed Dec 21 16:14:10 2022 -0500
>
>      Bump version to 3.3.2
>
>
> The Streams upgrade system tests verify the upgrade from a previous
> version to the current version. In the above the current version in
> gradle.properties is set from 3.3.2-SNAPSHOT to 3.3.2 but the test
> verifies for development version 3.3.2-SNAPSHOT.
>
> I ran the following failing test:
>
> TC_PATHS="tests/kafkatest/tests/streams/streams_application_upgrade_test.py::StreamsUpgradeTest.test_app_upgrade"
>
> _DUCKTAPE_OPTIONS='--parameters
> '\''{"bounce_type":"full","from_version":"2.2.2","to_version":"3.3.2-SNAPSHOT"}'\'
>
> bash tests/docker/run_tests.sh
>
> on the previous commit to the above commit, i.e.:
>
> commit e3212f28eb88e8f7fcf3d2d4c646b2a28b0f668e
> Author: José Armando García Sancio <jsan...@users.noreply.github.com>
> Date:   Tue Dec 20 10:55:14 2022 -0800
>
> and the test passed.
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
> On 10.01.23 19:25, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
> > Hey Chris,
> >
> > Here are the results:
> >
> http://confluent-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/system-test-kafka-branch-builder--1673314598--apache--HEAD--b66af662e6/2023-01-09--001./2023-01-09--001./report.html
> >
> > It looks like all of the failures are when trying to upgrade to
> > 3.3.2-SNAPSHOT. I saw a similar error in my PR here but I am not sure
> > if it is related: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13077
> >
> > Maybe someone familiar with Kafka Streams can help.
> >
> > Thanks,
>

Reply via email to