On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, at 14:37, Ron Dagostino wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Colin. > > There seems to be some inconsistency between sometimes referring to > "TargetKRaftControllerQuorum" and other times referring to > "DirectToKRaftControllerQuorum". Aside from that, it looks good to > me. The symmetry of bootstrap servers and bootstrap controllers feels > right. >
Hi Ron, Good point. I will replace all of them with DirectToKRaftControllerQuorum. > What happens in the combined case? Will it depend on the listener > that gets the request? So if you put the port for a controller > listener in bootstrap servers and that listener gets the request then > it fails, and vice-versa if you put the port for a non-controller > listener in bootstrap controllers and that listener gets the request > it also fails? Correct. Controller listeners are always distinct from broker listeners. best, Colin > > Ron > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 5:18 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I wrote a short KIP about allowing AdminClient to talk directly with the >> KRaft controller quorum. Check it out here: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Owo0Dw >> >> best, >> Colin
