+1 (non-binding) from me as well! This is the type of problem which is difficult to become aware of so the more guardrails we put into place the better.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 23:30, Beyene, Mehari <meh...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote: > Thank you, Justin. That makes sense. > I have updated the KIP to remove the concept of ahead/behind. Instead, we > will use the existing error message that utilizes the acceptable range for > the timestamps. > > Thanks, > Mehari > >
