Thank you for the KIP Abhinav. Although we should avoid changing customer-facing interfaces (such as metrics) after a KIP is accepted, in this case, I think that the divergence is minimal and the right thing to do in the longer run. Hence, I would consider this change as a one-off exception and not a precedent for the future changes.
+1 (binding) from me. Also, I think we should leave the vote open longer for some duration (at least 2 weeks) to give an opportunity for folks in the community to add any thoughts that they might have. The KIP has been published for only 1 day so far and interested folks may not have had a chance to look into it yet. -- Divij Vaidya On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 6:45 PM Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for the KIP. > > Thanks, > Satish. > > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 18:31, Kamal Chandraprakash > <kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > -- > > Kamal > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:30 AM Abhijeet Kumar <abhijeet.cse....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I would like to start the vote for KIP-930 Tiered Storage Metrics. > > > > > > The KIP is here: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-930%3A+Tiered+Storage+Metrics > > > > > > Regards > > > Abhijeet. > > >
