Hey -- just catching up here, since I saw the vote thread. I had 2 questions that I'm not sure got answered from the previous discussion.
1. Can we update the KIP to include the name of the other image so if someone stumbles across this KIP they know the name of the other one? 2. Did we cover what "experimental" means here? I think Ismael asked > Can we talk a bit more about the compatibility guarantees while this image is still experimental? I took this to mean should we be able to upgrade to or from this image or if clusters running on it can only run on it? Or if there are no guarantees about the upgrade/downgrade story. Thanks, Justine On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 7:54 PM Krishna Agarwal < krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for the insightful feedback on this KIP. > As there are no ongoing discussions, I'm considering moving into the voting > process. > Your continued input is greatly appreciated! > > Regards, > Krishna > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 12:47 PM Krishna Agarwal < > krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I want to submit a KIP to deliver an experimental Apache Kafka docker > > image. > > The proposed docker image can launch brokers with sub-second startup time > > and minimal memory footprint by leveraging a GraalVM based native Kafka > > binary. > > > > KIP-974: Docker Image for GraalVM based Native Kafka Broker > > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-974%3A+Docker+Image+for+GraalVM+based+Native+Kafka+Broker > > > > > > Regards, > > Krishna > > >
