Thank you for all the votes! I'm closing the vote thread as it is open for more than 72 hours. The KIP has been passed with 3 binding and 1 non-binding votes.
-- Kamal On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:51 PM Satish Duggana <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Kamal for the KIP. > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 17:04, Divij Vaidya <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > -- > > Divij Vaidya > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:30 AM Luke Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Kamal, > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > +1 (binding) from me. > > > > > > Luke > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:51 PM Christo Lolov <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Heya Kamal, > > > > > > > > The proposed change makes sense to me as it will be a more explicit > > > > behaviour than what Kafka does today - I am happy with it! > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) from me > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Christo > > > > > > > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 09:01, Kamal Chandraprakash < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to call a vote for KIP-1007 > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1007%3A+Introduce+Remote+Storage+Not+Ready+Exception > > > > > >. > > > > > This KIP aims to introduce a new error code for retriable remote > > > storage > > > > > errors. Thanks to everyone who reviewed the KIP! > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Kamal > > > > > > > > > > > > >
