Hey Artem, I took another look at the KIP and the discussion on the mailing list.
+1 (binding) from me :) Justine On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:23 AM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > It is so exiting to see this KIP and know that it will greatly benefit > Flink and other technologies. > > +1 > > Best regards, > > Martijn > > Op vr 1 dec 2023 om 11:07 schreef Artem Livshits > <alivsh...@confluent.io.invalid> > > > Hello, > > > > This is a voting thread for > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-939%3A+Support+Participation+in+2PC > > . > > > > The KIP proposes extending Kafka transaction support (that already uses > 2PC > > under the hood) to enable atomicity of dual writes to Kafka and an > external > > database, and helps to fix a long standing Flink issue. > > > > An example of code that uses the dual write recipe with JDBC and should > > work for most SQL databases is here > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14231. > > > > The FLIP for the sister fix in Flink is here > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=255071710 > > > > -Artem > > >
