Hi all,

Bumping the thread. Please review this KIP. Thanks!

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 9:11 PM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jorge,
>
> Thanks for the review! Added your suggestions to the KIP. PTAL.
>
> The `fetch.max.wait.ms` config will be also applicable for topics enabled
> with remote storage.
> Updated the description to:
>
> ```
> The maximum amount of time the server will block before answering the
> fetch request
> when it is reading near to the tail of the partition (high-watermark) and
> there isn't
> sufficient data to immediately satisfy the requirement given by
> fetch.min.bytes.
> ```
>
> --
> Kamal
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 12:12 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
> quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kamal,
>>
>> Thanks for this KIP! It should help to solve one of the main issues with
>> tiered storage at the moment that is dealing with individual consumer
>> configurations to avoid flooding logs with interrupted exceptions.
>>
>> One of the topics discussed in [1][2] was on the semantics of `
>> fetch.max.wait.ms` and how it's affected by remote storage. Should we
>> consider within this KIP the update of `fetch.max.wail.ms` docs to
>> clarify
>> it only applies to local storage?
>>
>> Otherwise, LGTM -- looking forward to see this KIP adopted.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15776
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14778#issuecomment-1820588080
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 01:01, Kamal Chandraprakash <
>> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have opened a KIP-1018
>> > <
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1018%3A+Introduce+max+remote+fetch+timeout+config+for+DelayedRemoteFetch+requests
>> > >
>> > to introduce dynamic max-remote-fetch-timeout broker config to give more
>> > control to the operator.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1018%3A+Introduce+max+remote+fetch+timeout+config+for+DelayedRemoteFetch+requests
>> >
>> > Let me know if you have any feedback or suggestions.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Kamal
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to