Hi all,
I had left a comment on the JIRA earlier, and thanks to Mickael I was made
aware of this thread, so I'll share it here too:
I agree it makes sense to make this information available through RPCs,
but the Quorum is probably not the right place to represent registered (but
inactive)
brokers – Quorum represents only the Raft-like part of the cluster.
I think it would make more sense to add a new field to
DescribeClusterResponse.
I guess handleDescribeCluster filters out inactive brokers to preserve the
ZK-mode behavior.
Thanks,
--
Igor
