Thanks Chia. I have updated KIP with this quote, in the migration plan section.
Thanks, Murali On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 3:30 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Muralidhar Basani <[email protected]> 於 2024年9月15日 > 晚上9:02 寫道： > > > > With this, I think, users don't have to make any explicit changes in > their > > code, if their provider is reload4j. And if it's a different provider > (like > > logback, log4j), they would have to upgrade that to match it with slf4j. > > If upgrading the matched provider is the only explicit change and we > expect users have responsibility to keep consistent version when using > other providers , could we write it down to the KIP? > > That means we will update slf4j without KIP in the future except for > specific reason. > > Best, > Chia-Ping
