Thanks for this KIP! I second this would be useful and it's a gap we have in observability at the moment.
Regards, Gaurav On 2022/08/30 14:39:09 Igor Soarez wrote: > Hi Pere, > > Thanks for the KIP. I think this would be a useful addition. > > Best, > > -- > Igor > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 12:11 PM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > Hi Pere, > > > > Thanks for the KIP, it is a useful metric. Btw, in the `Public Interfaces` > > section, can we just document the metric names since the code and sensors > > are not part of the public API? The proposed changes section includes the > > code anyway. You can use `Selector Monitoring` in the docs ( > > https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#selector_monitoring) as an example. > > > > Regards, > > > > Rajini > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 12:22 PM Pere Urbón Bayes <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> I would love to kick start a discussion for KIP-703, the proposal is > >> available > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-703%3A+Add+a+metrics+for+reporting+idle+connections+closed > >> > >> It is a minor change but certainly helps to improve the ops day2day life. > >> > >> What do you think? Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and feedback. > >> > >> -- > >> Pere Urbon-Bayes > >> Software Architect > >> https://twitter.com/purbon > >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/purbon/ > >> >
