+1 (binding)
On 1/27/26 3:48 AM, Sean Quah via dev wrote:
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Sean
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 8:43 PM Andrew Schofield <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for the KIP. It's a really nice fix to the protocol.
+1 (binding)
Andrew
On 2026/01/26 15:10:55 David Jacot via dev wrote:
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for the KIP! This is a great improvement. +1 (binding)
Best,
David
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:58 AM Lucas Brutschy via dev <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to start a vote for the KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1251%3A+Assignment+epochs+for+consumer+groups
The high-level summary is the proposal to add assignment epochs to
KIP-848-style consumer groups. The idea is to avoid failing offset
commits in the new consumer protocol by relaxing the member epoch
validation slightly.
The KIP will completely eliminate the transient STALE_MEMBER_EPOCH
that we observe during rebalances with the new protocol. So it will
also improve the protocol's efficiency during rebalances.
Cheers,
Lucas
