Bumping this thread. It needs 1 more vote. jian fu <[email protected]> 于2026年2月16日周一 08:24写道：
> Hi Chia-Ping, > > Thanks for your comments. > The proposed configuration change adds more flexibility while preserving > the original behavior, and two others also agreed with it. So I’ve adopted > the suggestion and updated the KIP and PR accordingly. > Really appreciate your input! > > Hi all, > The new comments have been addressed. > Could someone please take another look at this KIP and vote if no further > issues are found? We just need one vote now to move this forward . > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > Jian > > Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> 于2026年2月5日周四 03:08写道： > >> hi Jian >> >> Sorry for the late reply. I raised a major comment here: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tr0khlvvpstqbqz3fs1xod0hzc9sf66p >> >> please take a look, thanks >> >> On 2026/01/12 13:12:13 jian fu wrote: >> > Hi all: >> > >> > I would like to start a vote for the KIP: >> > >> > The KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/A4LMFw >> > The Draft PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/20913 >> > >> > Summary: >> > >> > Currently, Kafka's tiered storage implementation uploads all non-active >> > local log segments to remote storage immediately, even when they are >> still >> > within the local retention period. >> > This results in redundant storage of the same data in both local and >> remote >> > which don't have real value in some cases. >> > This KIP's goal is to reduce the remote storage as an optional topic >> > feature which can be implemented with few code lines. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > Jian >> > >> >
