Hi Jun and Chia-Ping, I've been thinking and discussing the changes to the KIP-714 RPCs. There are too many combinations for my liking at the moment. I want to take another pass at this area and will make an update in a few days.
I intend to start a new vote once we have consensus because the spec has changed somewhat since the earliest votes. Thanks, Andrew On 2026/05/06 17:28:27 Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: > hi Andrew > > chia_0: If the consensus is to remove the "duplicate" field from the RPC > payloads, the tagged field in the header will essentially become a required > field. This means the broker needs to handle the edge case where both the > header and the request body have no ClientInstanceId, right? If so, would you > mind clarifying the expected broker behavior in the KIP? > > Best, > Chia-Ping > > On 2026/04/03 16:17:37 Andrew Schofield wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to start the discussion on KIP-1313. This adds a unique client > > instance ID to the request header of all Kafka protocol requests to give a > > unique identifier which can be used to correlate the requests from each > > client for the purposes of problem determination. > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1313%3A+Client+instance+ID+in+all+request+headers > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > >
