Hi Mickael, Thanks for the clarification - definitely understood. I appreciate the guidance through the KIP process.
Best, Aditya On 2026/05/26 14:16:31 Mickael Maison wrote: > Hi, > > The KIP seems fine. Considering it's pretty straight forward, I think > you could start a vote. > > Just for the record, being featured in my digest does not mean a KIP > will be accepted or anything. > > Thanks, > Mickael > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 9:18 PM Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Quick follow-up on this KIP. Mickael included a nice summary in the March > > 2026 Monthly Digest: > > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2026/04/03/kafka-monthly-digest-march-2026#kafka_improvement_proposals > > > > Appreciate any feedback and thoughts you might have. > > > > Best, > > Aditya > > > > > On Apr 1, 2026, at 08:34, Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to start a discussion on KIP-1307: SerDe and Interceptor Metrics. > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1307%3A+SerDe+and+Interceptor+Metrics > > > > > > Serialization, deserialization, and interceptors run in the client hot > > > path with no timing or error metrics. A slow custom SerDe or interceptor > > > is currently indistinguishable from a slow broker. This KIP adds the > > > missing metrics using the existing Sensor infrastructure. > > > > > > Looking forward to your feedback. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Aditya Kousik >
