Hi all, I have a small update regarding the KIP: For the new valueJoiner functional interface, I renamed it and reordered the params: Old: ValueJoinerWithMappedAndStreamKey<TableKey, StreamKey, StreamValue, TableValue, VOut> New: ValueJoinerWithStreamAndMappedKey<StreamKey, TableKey, StreamValue, TableValue, VOut> This change is to make the parameter order like `Key1, Key2, Value1, Value2`, which is more natural than `Key2, Key1, Value1, Value2` in terms of semantics.
Let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this change. Thanks! Best, Lucy Liu On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 10:33 AM Lucy Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the confusion earlier. The KIP has now received three binding +1 > votes and 1 non-binding +1 vote, and has been accepted. > > - Binding +1: Bill, Matthias, Frank > - Non-binding +1: Alieh > > Thanks all for the review! > > Best, > Lucy Liu > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 8:24 PM Lucy Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Matthias, >> >> Thanks for the reminder! Sorry I completely forgot about it. I will >> change the status and keep it open. >> >> Best, >> Lucy liu >> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 8:20 PM Matthias J. Sax <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Lucy, a vote must stay open for at least 72h. No need to follow up, in >>> case nobody else replies, but technically we need to accept votes at >>> least until the 72h passed. >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> >>> On 7/1/26 12:06 PM, Lucy Liu via dev wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > The KIP has now received three binding +1 votes and 1 non-binding +1 >>> vote, >>> > and therefore has been accepted. >>> > >>> > - Binding +1: Bill, Matthias, Frank >>> > - Non-binding +1: Alieh >>> > >>> > Thanks all for the review! >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > Lucy Liu >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 1:00 PM Alieh Saeedi via dev < >>> [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Thanks Lucy for the KIP. >>> >> >>> >> The KIP looks perfect to me:) >>> >> >>> >> +1 (non-binding) >>> >> >>> >> -Alieh >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2026, 4:57 PM TengYao Chi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks for the KIP! >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> TengYao Chi >>> >>> >>> >>> Matthias J. Sax <[email protected]> 於 2026年7月1日週三 上午7:43寫道： >>> >>> >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On 6/30/26 1:27 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote: >>> >>>>> Thanks for the KIP! >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 10:12 PM Lucy Liu via dev < >>> >>> [email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> I would like to start a vote for KIP-1340: Expose Both Mapped Key >>> >> and >>> >>>>>> Stream Key in Streams-GlobalKTable Joins. >>> >>>>>> This KIP introduces a new ValueJoinerWithMultipleKeys functional >>> >>>> interface >>> >>>>>> and four corresponding KStream#join / leftJoin overloads for >>> >>>>>> stream-GlobalKTable joins that expose both the mapped join key >>> (the >>> >>>>>> GlobalKTable lookup key) and the original stream record key, and >>> >>>> deprecates >>> >>>>>> the existing ValueJoinerWithKey-based overloads. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> KIP: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/KAFKA/pages/421958552/KIP-1340*Expose*Both*Mapped*Key*and*Stream*Key*in*Streams-GlobalKTable*Joins__;KysrKysrKysrKw!!Ayb5sqE7!uYBwREDVQoFp4shkUEIER9OFQZcZEdkVu6oyYzbuwQMPGyDfIoIdOuUf9iNhyjrXuUrwT9BNaxY8mxO_RzO9Mus$ >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Discussion Thread: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/mshwxyjs6z4crrf26ffsk2j4ygmrmm7s__;!!Ayb5sqE7!uYBwREDVQoFp4shkUEIER9OFQZcZEdkVu6oyYzbuwQMPGyDfIoIdOuUf9iNhyjrXuUrwT9BNaxY8mxO_HNRo2tM$ >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>>> Lucy Liu >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>>
