-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30259/#review69727
-----------------------------------------------------------


This is a nice improvement to the project.  Thanks!


core/src/main/scala/kafka/utils/ZkUtils.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/30259/#comment114480>

    Are there any open issues against scoverage that would explain why it can't 
instrument this class?  If not, it might be worth contacting that project to 
see if they have any ideas why it blows up on this class.  Probably would be 
good to add a TODO explaining that once scoverage can process this class the 
$COVERAGE-OFF$ should be removed.


- Eric Olander


On Jan. 25, 2015, 8:47 p.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30259/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 8:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1722
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1722
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KAFKA-1722: Add static code coverage capability
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build.gradle 1cbab29ce83e20dae0561b51eed6fdb86d522f28 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/utils/ZkUtils.scala 
> c14bd455b6642f5e6eb254670bef9f57ae41d6cb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30259/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> How to run: ./gradlew sonarRunner -PscalaVersion=2.11
> 
> Note that if you do not have sonarqube running on your system. The 
> sonarRunner task will fail, but it would have generated coverage reports for 
> core and clients at core/build/reports/scoverage/ and 
> clients/build/reports/jacocoHtml respectively. Open index.html in any of 
> those dirs to see the coverage.
> 
> Once gradle-scoverage starts publishing scoverage report, a single report 
> generated from sonar will be available.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashish Singh
> 
>

Reply via email to