> On Jan. 23, 2015, 4:47 p.m., Neha Narkhede wrote:
> > core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/ConsumerGroupCommand.scala, line 114
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29831/diff/6/?file=829769#file829769line114>
> >
> >     How is this tool going to behave if the consumer's offset information 
> > is stored in kafka, not zookeeper?
> >     
> >     The assumption of the user would be to handle that case transparently 
> > as well.

Addressed this in a later comment. Adding the JIRA to this for completeness: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1921


- Onur


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29831/#review69400
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 4, 2015, 11:41 p.m., Onur Karaman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29831/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 4, 2015, 11:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1476
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1476
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Merged in work for KAFKA-1476 and sub-task KAFKA-1826
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   bin/kafka-consumer-groups.sh PRE-CREATION 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/AdminUtils.scala 
> 28b12c7b89a56c113b665fbde1b95f873f8624a3 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/ConsumerGroupCommand.scala PRE-CREATION 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/utils/ZkUtils.scala 
> c14bd455b6642f5e6eb254670bef9f57ae41d6cb 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/admin/DeleteConsumerGroupTest.scala 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/admin/DeleteTopicTest.scala 
> 33c27678bf8ae8feebcbcdaa4b90a1963157b4a5 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/utils/TestUtils.scala 
> 54755e8dd3f23ced313067566cd4ea867f8a496e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29831/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Onur Karaman
> 
>

Reply via email to