Evan Huus created KAFKA-2143:
--------------------------------

             Summary: Replicas get ahead of leader and fail
                 Key: KAFKA-2143
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2143
             Project: Kafka
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: replication
    Affects Versions: 0.8.2.1
            Reporter: Evan Huus
            Assignee: Neha Narkhede


On a cluster of 6 nodes, we recently saw a case where a single under-replicated 
partition suddenly appeared, replication lag spiked, and network IO spiked. The 
cluster appeared to recover eventually on its own,

Looking at the logs, the thing which failed was partition 7 of the topic 
{{background_queue}}. It had an ISR of 1,4,3 and its leader at the time was 3. 
Here are the interesting log lines:

On node 3 (the leader):
{noformat}
[2015-04-23 16:50:05,879] ERROR [Replica Manager on Broker 3]: Error when 
processing fetch request for partition [background_queue,7] offset 3722949957 
from follower with correlation id 148185816. Possible cause: Request for offset 
3722949957 but we only have log segments in the range 3648049863 to 3722949955. 
(kafka.server.ReplicaManager)
[2015-04-23 16:50:05,879] ERROR [Replica Manager on Broker 3]: Error when 
processing fetch request for partition [background_queue,7] offset 3722949957 
from follower with correlation id 156007054. Possible cause: Request for offset 
3722949957 but we only have log segments in the range 3648049863 to 3722949955. 
(kafka.server.ReplicaManager)
[2015-04-23 16:50:13,960] INFO Partition [background_queue,7] on broker 3: 
Shrinking ISR for partition [background_queue,7] from 1,4,3 to 3 
(kafka.cluster.Partition)
{noformat}

And on nodes 1 and 4 (the replicas) many occurrences of the following:
{noformat}
[2015-04-23 16:50:05,935] INFO Scheduling log segment 3648049863 for log 
background_queue-7 for deletion. (kafka.log.Log) (edited)
{noformat}

Based on my reading, this looks like the replicas somehow got *ahead* of the 
leader, asked for an invalid offset, got confused, and re-replicated the entire 
topic from scratch to recover (this matches our network graphs, which show 3 
sending a bunch of data to 1 and 4).

Taking a stab in the dark at the cause, there appears to be a race condition 
where replicas can receive a new offset before the leader has committed it and 
is ready to replicate?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to