I actually feel many [VOTE] threads eventually become [DISCUSS] as people
just put tons of comments there :)


On 5/20/15, 11:52 AM, "Jay Kreps" <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Makes sense. Honghai, want to do a [VOTE] thread just so everything is
>official?
>
>-Jay
>
>On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Gwen Shapira <gshap...@cloudera.com>
>wrote:
>
>> For simple discussions, I completely agree.
>>
>> For those threads where there are few votes, and then more discussion,
>>and
>> then KIP changes few times... separate thread will help keep things
>>clear
>> for both voters and anyone who will try to figure out what happened in
>>the
>> future.
>>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > How do people feel about these [DISCUSS] threads that basically
>> > accidentally turn into votes. Like basically everyone was +1 on this
>>KIP
>> > already should we just skip the second vote? I find it kind of
>>annoying
>> to
>> > do both when this happens.
>> >
>> > -Jay
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Honghai Chen <
>> honghai.c...@microsoft.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > All issues fixed, test cases added, performance result on windows
>> > > attached.  The patch can help improve the consume performance around
>> > > 25%~50%.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks, Honghai Chen
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Jun Rao [mailto:j...@confluent.io]
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 5:39 AM
>> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 20 Enable log preallocate to improve
>>consume
>> > > performance under windows and some old Linux file system
>> > >
>> > > Thanks. Could you updated the wiki? Also, commented on the jira.
>> > >
>> > > Jun
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Honghai Chen <
>> > honghai.c...@microsoft.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Use config.segmentSize should be ok.   Previously add that one for
>> make
>> > > > sure the file not exceed config.segmentSize, actually the function
>> > > > maybeRoll already make sure that.
>> > > > When try add test case for recover, blocked by the rename related
>> > > > issue, just open one jira at
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2170 , any
>> recommendation
>> > > for fix that issue?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks, Honghai Chen
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: Jun Rao [mailto:j...@confluent.io]
>> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 12:51 PM
>> > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 20 Enable log preallocate to improve
>> > > > consume performance under windows and some old Linux file system
>> > > >
>> > > > This seems similar to what's in
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1065.
>> > > >
>> > > > Also, could you explain why the preallocated size is set to
>> > > > config.segmentSize
>> > > > - 2 * config.maxMessageSize, instead of just config.segmentSize?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > >
>> > > > Jun
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Honghai Chen
>> > > > <honghai.c...@microsoft.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >   Hi guys,
>> > > > >         I'm trying add test cases, but below case crashed at
>>line "
>> > > > > segReopen.recover(64*1024)--> index.trimToValidSize()  ", any
>>idea
>> > > > > for
>> > > > it?
>> > > > > Appreciate your help.
>> > > > >         The case assume kafka suddenly crash, and need recover
>>the
>> > > > > last segment.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > kafka.log.LogSegmentTest > testCreateWithInitFileSizeCrash
>>FAILED
>> > > > >     java.io.IOException: The requested operation cannot be
>> performed
>> > > > > on a file w ith a user-mapped section open
>> > > > >         at java.io.RandomAccessFile.setLength(Native Method)
>> > > > >         at
>> > > > >
>> kafka.log.OffsetIndex$$anonfun$resize$1.apply(OffsetIndex.scala:292)
>> > > > >         at
>> > > > >
>> kafka.log.OffsetIndex$$anonfun$resize$1.apply(OffsetIndex.scala:283)
>> > > > >         at kafka.utils.CoreUtils$.inLock(CoreUtils.scala:288)
>> > > > >         at kafka.log.OffsetIndex.resize(OffsetIndex.scala:283)
>> > > > >         at
>> > > > >
>> kafka.log.OffsetIndex$$anonfun$trimToValidSize$1.apply$mcV$sp(Offset
>> > > > > I
>> > > > > ndex.scala:272)
>> > > > >         at
>> > > > >
>> kafka.log.OffsetIndex$$anonfun$trimToValidSize$1.apply(OffsetIndex.s
>> > > > > c
>> > > > > ala:272)
>> > > > >         at
>> > > > >
>> kafka.log.OffsetIndex$$anonfun$trimToValidSize$1.apply(OffsetIndex.s
>> > > > > c
>> > > > > ala:272)
>> > > > >         at kafka.utils.CoreUtils$.inLock(CoreUtils.scala:288)
>> > > > >         at
>> > kafka.log.OffsetIndex.trimToValidSize(OffsetIndex.scala:271)
>> > > > >         at kafka.log.LogSegment.recover(LogSegment.scala:199)
>> > > > >         at
>> > > > >
>> kafka.log.LogSegmentTest.testCreateWithInitFileSizeCrash(LogSegmentT
>> > > > > e
>> > > > > st.scala:306)
>> > > > >
>> > > > >   def recover(maxMessageSize: Int): Int = {
>> > > > >     index.truncate()
>> > > > >     index.resize(index.maxIndexSize)
>> > > > >     var validBytes = 0
>> > > > >     var lastIndexEntry = 0
>> > > > >     val iter = log.iterator(maxMessageSize)
>> > > > >     try {
>> > > > >       while(iter.hasNext) {
>> > > > >         val entry = iter.next
>> > > > >         entry.message.ensureValid()
>> > > > >         if(validBytes - lastIndexEntry > indexIntervalBytes) {
>> > > > >           // we need to decompress the message, if required, to
>>get
>> > > > > the offset of the first uncompressed message
>> > > > >           val startOffset =
>> > > > >             entry.message.compressionCodec match {
>> > > > >               case NoCompressionCodec =>
>> > > > >                 entry.offset
>> > > > >               case _ =>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ByteBufferMessageSet.deepIterator(entry.message).next().offset
>> > > > >           }
>> > > > >           index.append(startOffset, validBytes)
>> > > > >           lastIndexEntry = validBytes
>> > > > >         }
>> > > > >         validBytes += MessageSet.entrySize(entry.message)
>> > > > >       }
>> > > > >     } catch {
>> > > > >       case e: InvalidMessageException =>
>> > > > >         logger.warn("Found invalid messages in log segment %s at
>> > > > > byte offset %d: %s.".format(log.file.getAbsolutePath,
>>validBytes,
>> > > > e.getMessage))
>> > > > >     }
>> > > > >     val truncated = log.sizeInBytes - validBytes
>> > > > >     log.truncateTo(validBytes)
>> > > > >     index.trimToValidSize()
>> > > > >     truncated
>> > > > >   }
>> > > > >
>> > > > > /* create a segment with   pre allocate and Crash*/
>> > > > >   @Test
>> > > > >   def testCreateWithInitFileSizeCrash() {
>> > > > >     val tempDir = TestUtils.tempDir()
>> > > > >     val seg = new LogSegment(tempDir, 40, 1, 1000, 0,
>>SystemTime,
>> > > > > false, 512*1024*1024, true)
>> > > > >
>> > > > >     val ms = messages(50, "hello", "there")
>> > > > >     seg.append(50, ms)
>> > > > >     val ms2 = messages(60, "alpha", "beta")
>> > > > >     seg.append(60, ms2)
>> > > > >     val read = seg.read(startOffset = 55, maxSize = 200,
>>maxOffset
>> =
>> > > > None)
>> > > > >     assertEquals(ms2.toList, read.messageSet.toList)
>> > > > >     val oldSize = seg.log.sizeInBytes()
>> > > > >     val oldPosition = seg.log.channel.position
>> > > > >     val oldFileSize = seg.log.file.length
>> > > > >     assertEquals(512*1024*1024, oldFileSize)
>> > > > >     seg.flush()
>> > > > >     seg.log.channel.close()
>> > > > >     seg.index.close()
>> > > > >
>> > > > >     val segReopen = new LogSegment(tempDir, 40, 1, 1000, 0,
>> > > > > SystemTime,
>> > > > > true)
>> > > > >     segReopen.recover(64*1024)
>> > > > >     val size = segReopen.log.sizeInBytes()
>> > > > >     val position = segReopen.log.channel.position
>> > > > >     val fileSize = segReopen.log.file.length
>> > > > >     assertEquals(oldPosition, position)
>> > > > >     assertEquals(oldSize, size)
>> > > > >     assertEquals(size, fileSize)
>> > > > >   }
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks, Honghai Chen
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: Sriram Subramanian [mailto:
>> srsubraman...@linkedin.com.INVALID]
>> > > > > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 12:57 AM
>> > > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > > > > Cc: Roshan Naik
>> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 20 Enable log preallocate to improve
>> > > > > consume performance under windows and some old Linux file system
>> > > > >
>> > > > > +1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Some information on how this will be tested would be useful.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 4/23/15 9:33 AM, "Jay Kreps" <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >Yeah if we understand the optimal policy for a config we always
>> > > > > >want to set it automatically. In this case I don't think we do
>> yet,
>> > > > > >but down the road that could be nice. I think for now we should
>> > > > > >consider this option experimental to give people a chance to
>>try
>> it
>> > > out.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >-Jay
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Honghai Chen
>> > > > > ><honghai.c...@microsoft.com>
>> > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> Hi Roshan,
>> > > > > >>         Use the 'auto' value maybe will break the rule and
>>mess
>> > > > > >> up the configuration. @Jay, any thoughts?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Thanks, Honghai Chen
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > >> From: Sriharsha Chintalapani [mailto:harsh...@fastmail.fm]
>> > > > > >> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 6:27 AM
>> > > > > >> To: dev@kafka.apache.org; Roshan Naik
>> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 20 Enable log preallocate to
>>improve
>> > > > > >> consume performance under windows and some old Linux file
>>system
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> +1 (non-binding).
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> --
>> > > > > >> Harsha
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On April 22, 2015 at 2:52:12 PM, Roshan Naik
>> > > > > >> (ros...@hortonworks.com)
>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> I see that it is safe to keep it this off by default due to
>>some
>> > > > > >>concerns.
>> > > > > >> Eventually, for settings such as this whose 'preferred'
>>value is
>> > > > > >>platform  specific (or based on other criteria), it might be
>> worth
>> > > > > >>considering  having a default value that is not a constant
>>but an
>> > > > > >>'auto' value ..
>> > > > > >>When
>> > > > > >> kafka boots up it can automatically use the preferred value.
>> > > > > >>Ofcourse it  would have to documented as to what auto means
>>for a
>> > > > given platform.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> -roshan
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On 4/22/15 1:21 PM, "Jakob Homan" <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> >+1. This is an important performance fix for Windows-based
>> > > clusters.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >-Jakob
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >On 22 April 2015 at 03:25, Honghai Chen
>> > > > > >> ><honghai.c...@microsoft.com>
>> > > > > >> >wrote:
>> > > > > >> >> Fix the issue Sriram mentioned. Code review and jira/KIP
>> > updated.
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> Below are detail description for the scenarios:
>> > > > > >> >> 1.If do clear shutdown, the last log file will be
>>truncated
>> to
>> > > > > >> >>its real size since the close() function of FileMessageSet
>> will
>> > > > > >> >>call
>> > > > > >>trim(),
>> > > > > >> >> 2.If crash, then when restart, will go through the
>>process of
>> > > > > >> >>recover() and the last log file will be truncate to its
>>real
>> > > > > >> >>size,
>> > > > > >>(and
>> > > > > >> >>the position will be moved to end of the file)  3.When
>>service
>> > > > > >> >>start and open existing file  a.Will run the LogSegment
>> > > > > >> >>constructor which has NO parameter "preallocate",  b.Then
>>in
>> > > > > >> >>FileMessageSet, the "end" in FileMessageSet will be
>> > > > > >> >>Int.MaxValue, and then
>> > > "channel.position(math.min(channel.size().toInt, end))"
>> > > > > >> >>will make the position be end of the file,  c.If recover
>> > > > > >> >>needed, the recover function will truncate file to end
>> > > > > >>of
>> > > > > >> >>valid data, and also move the position to it,
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> 4.When service running and need create new log segment and
>> new
>> > > > > >> >>FileMessageSet
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> a.If preallocate = truei.the "end" in FileMessageSet will
>>be
>> > > > > >> >>0, the file size will be "initFileSize", and then
>> > > > > >> >>"channel.position(math.min(channel.size().toInt, end))"
>>will
>> > > > > >> >>make the position be 0,
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> b.Else if preallocate = falsei.backward compatible, the
>>"end"
>> > > > > >> >>in FileMessageSet will be Int.MaxValue, the file size will
>>be
>> > > > > >> >>"0", and then
>>"channel.position(math.min(channel.size().toInt,
>> > > end))"
>> > > > > >> >>will make the position be 0,
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-20+-+Enable+
>> > > > > >>lo
>> > > > > >>g+
>> > > > > >>pre
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >>>>allocate+to+improve+consume+performance+under+windows+and+some+old+L
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >>>>allocate+to+improve+consume+performance+under+windows+and+some+old+i
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >>>>allocate+to+improve+consume+performance+under+windows+and+some+old+n
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >>>>allocate+to+improve+consume+performance+under+windows+and+some+old+u
>> > > > > >>>>x+
>> > > > > >> >>file+system
>> > > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1646
>> > > > > >> >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33204/diff/2/
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> Thanks, Honghai Chen
>> > > > > >> >> http://aka.ms/kafka
>> > > > > >> >> http://aka.ms/manifold
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > >> >> From: Honghai Chen
>> > > > > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:12 AM
>> > > > > >> >> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > > > > >> >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KIP 20 Enable log preallocate to
>> > > > > >> >> improve
>> > > > > >>consume
>> > > > > >> >>performance under windows and some old Linux file system
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> Hi Sriram,
>> > > > > >> >> One sentence of code missed, will update code review board
>> and
>> > > > > >> >>KIP soon.
>> > > > > >> >> For LogSegment and FileMessageSet, must use different
>> > > > > >> >>constructor function for existing file and new file, then
>>the
>> > > code "
>> > > > > >> >>channel.position(math.min(channel.size().toInt, end)) "
>>will
>> > > > > >> >>make sure the position at end of existing file.
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> Thanks, Honghai Chen
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > >> >> From: Jay Kreps [mailto:jay.kr...@gmail.com]
>> > > > > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:22 AM
>> > > > > >> >> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>> > > > > >> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP 20 Enable log preallocate to
>> > > > > >> >> improve
>> > > > > >>consume
>> > > > > >> >>performance under windows and some old Linux file system
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> My understanding of the patch is that clean shutdown
>> truncates
>> > > > > >> >> the
>> > > > > >>file
>> > > > > >> >>back to it's true size (and reallocates it on startup).
>>Hard
>> > > > > >> >>crash is handled by the normal recovery which should
>>truncate
>> > > > > >> >>off the empty portion of the file.
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Sriram Subramanian <
>> > > > > >> >>srsubraman...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >>
>> > > > > >> >>> Could you describe how recovery works in this mode? Say,
>>we
>> > > > > >> >>> had a
>> > > > > >>250
>> > > > > >> >>> MB preallocated segment and we wrote till 50MB and
>>crashed.
>> > > > > >> >>> Till
>> > > > > >>what
>> > > > > >> >>> point do we recover? Also, on startup, how is the append
>>end
>> > > > > >> >>> pointer set even on a clean shutdown? How does the
>> > > > > >> >>> FileChannel end position get set to 50 MB instead of 250
>>MB?
>> > > > > >> >>> The existing code might just
>> > > > > >>work
>> > > > > >> >>> for it but explaining that would be useful.
>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > >> >>> On 4/21/15 9:40 AM, "Neha Narkhede" <n...@confluent.io>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > >> >>> >+1. I've tried this on Linux and it helps reduce the
>>spikes
>> > > > > >> >>> >+in
>> > > > > >>append
>> > > > > >> >>> >+(and
>> > > > > >> >>> >hence producer) latency for high throughput writes. I am
>> not
>> > > > > >>entirely
>> > > > > >> >>> >sure why but my suspicion is that in the absence of
>> > > > > >> >>> >preallocation, you see spikes writes need to happen
>>faster
>> > > > > >> >>> >than the time it takes Linux to allocate the next block
>>to
>> > > > > >> >>> >the
>> > > > file.
>> > > > > >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >It will be great to see some performance test results
>>too.
>> > > > > >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Jay Kreps
>> > > > > >> >>> ><jay.kr...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > >> >>>wrote:
>> > > > > >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >> I'm also +1 on this. The change is quite small and may
>> > > > > >> >>> >>actually help perf on Linux as well (we've never tried
>> > this).
>> > > > > >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >>> >> I have a lot of concerns on testing the various
>>failure
>> > > > > >>conditions
>> > > > > >> >>> >> but I think since it will be off by default the risk
>>is
>> > > > > >> >>> >> not too
>> > > > > >> >>>high.
>> > > > > >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >>> >> -Jay
>> > > > > >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >>> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Honghai Chen
>> > > > > >> >>> >><honghai.c...@microsoft.com>
>> > > > > >> >>> >> wrote:
>> > > > > >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >>> >> > I wrote a KIP for this after some discussion on
>> > KAFKA-1646.
>> > > > > >> >>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1646
>> > > > > >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-20+-+Enable+
>> > > > > >>lo
>> > > > > >>g+
>> > > > > >> >>> pre
>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> 
>>>>>>>>>allocate+to+improve+consume+performance+under+windows+and+some+old
>>>>>>>>>+L
>> > > > > >>>>>>>in
>> > > > > >> >>>>>ux+
>> > > > > >> >>> >>file+system
>> > > > > >> >>> >> > The RB is here:
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33204/diff/
>> > > > > >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >> > Thanks, Honghai
>> > > > > >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >>
>> > > > > >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >
>> > > > > >> >>> >--
>> > > > > >> >>> >Thanks,
>> > > > > >> >>> >Neha
>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > >> >>>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to