Hi Gwen, Yes, it looks like it passed with a lazy majority :)
I should be submitting a patch with a few initial tests today or tomorrow. Cheers, Geoff On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Gwen Shapira <gshap...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I counted 3 binding votes (Jun, Neha, Joe) and two non-binding (Ewen and > I). > So I assume the KIP passed :) > > What's the next step? Are we expecting a patch with few initial tests soon? > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Geoffrey Anderson <ge...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Kafka, > >> > >> After a few rounds of discussion on KIP-25, there doesn't seem to be > >> opposition, so I'd like to propose a vote. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Geoff > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey Anderson <ge...@confluent.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi KIP-25 thread, > >> > > >> > I consolidated some of the questions from this thread and elsewhere. > >> > > >> > Q: Can we see a map of what system-test currently tests, which ones we > >> > want to replace and JIRAs for replacing? > >> > A: Initial draft here: > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Roadmap+-+port+existing+system+tests > >> > > >> > Q: Will ducktape be maintained separately as a github repo? > >> > A: Yes https://github.com/confluentinc/ducktape > >> > > >> > Q: How easy is viewing the test results and logs, how will test > output be > >> > structured? > >> > A: Hierarchical structure as outlined here: > >> > https://github.com/confluentinc/ducktape/wiki/Design-overview#output > >> > > >> > Q: Does it support code coverage? If not, how easy/ difficult would > it be > >> > to support? > >> > A: It does not, and we have no immediate plans to support this. > >> Difficulty > >> > unclear. > >> > > >> > Q: It would be nice if each Kafka version that we release will also > >> > have a separate "tests" artifact that users can download, untar and > >> easily > >> > run against a Kafka cluster of the same version. > >> > A: This seems reasonable and not too much extra work. Definitely open > to > >> > discussion on this. > >> > > >> > Q: Why not share running services across multiple tests? > >> > A: Prefer to optimize for simplicity and correctness over what might > be a > >> > questionable improvement in run-time. > >> > > >> > Q: Are regressions - in the road map? > >> > A: yes > >> > > >> > Q: Are Jepsen style tests involving network failures in the road map? > >> > A: yes > >> > > >> > Thanks much, > >> > Geoff > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >
