[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14649523#comment-14649523
]
Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-1690:
------------------------------------
[~harsha_ch], I just meant whether it should be merged as it is, or if the
remaining issues should be handled first. Nothing more. :) I think you took my
comment to mean more than I meant.
IMO the reason why comments keep coming up is because the patch is very large
and people miss things. There have been a number of studies on this.
Regarding style issues, I don't understand why big patches should have a
different standard than small ones. Not my call though.
> new java producer needs ssl support as a client
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-1690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1690
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Joe Stein
> Assignee: Sriharsha Chintalapani
> Fix For: 0.8.3
>
> Attachments: KAFKA-1690.patch, KAFKA-1690.patch,
> KAFKA-1690_2015-05-10_23:20:30.patch, KAFKA-1690_2015-05-10_23:31:42.patch,
> KAFKA-1690_2015-05-11_16:09:36.patch, KAFKA-1690_2015-05-12_16:20:08.patch,
> KAFKA-1690_2015-05-15_07:18:21.patch, KAFKA-1690_2015-05-20_14:54:35.patch,
> KAFKA-1690_2015-05-21_10:37:08.patch, KAFKA-1690_2015-06-03_18:52:29.patch,
> KAFKA-1690_2015-06-23_13:18:20.patch, KAFKA-1690_2015-07-20_06:10:42.patch,
> KAFKA-1690_2015-07-20_11:59:57.patch, KAFKA-1690_2015-07-25_12:10:55.patch
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
