[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14988504#comment-14988504 ]
Grant Henke edited comment on KAFKA-2702 at 11/3/15 11:54 PM: -------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for all the input [~jkreps], [~gwenshap], [~abiletskyi], [~ijuma], [~junrao] I have updated the PR removing the required field and changing all instances of non-required field to default to null. I also uploaded a v2 sample output to this jira. Most notably defaults of "" and null are now output and I added a "valid values" column. was (Author: granthenke): Thanks for all the input [~jkreps][~gwenshap][~abiletskyi][~ijuma][~junrao] I have updated the PR removing the required field and changing all instances of non-required field to default to null. I also uploaded a v2 sample output to this jira. Most notably defaults of "" and null are now output and I added a "valid values" column. > ConfigDef toHtmlTable() sorts in a way that is a bit confusing > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KAFKA-2702 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2702 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gwen Shapira > Assignee: Grant Henke > Attachments: ConsumerConfig-After-v2.html, ConsumerConfig-After.html, > ConsumerConfig-Before.html > > > Because we put everything without default first (without prioritizing), > critical parameters get placed below low priority ones when they both have > no defaults. Some parameters are without default and optional (SASL server in > ConsumerConfig for instance). > Try printing ConsumerConfig parameters and see the mandatory group.id show up > as #15. > I suggest sorting the no-default parameters by priority as well, or perhaps > adding a "REQUIRED" category that gets printed first no matter what. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)