[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15127306#comment-15127306
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-3060:
---------------------------------------

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/826


> Refactor MeteredXXStore
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-3060
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3060
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: kafka streams
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0.1
>            Reporter: Yasuhiro Matsuda
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.9.1.0
>
>
> ** copied from a github comment by Guozhang Wang **
> The original motivation of having the MeteredXXStore is to wrap all metrics / 
> logging semantics into one place so they do not need to be re-implemented 
> again, but this seems to be an obstacle with the current pattern now, for 
> example MeteredWindowStore.putAndReturnInternalKey is only used for logging, 
> and MeteredWindowStore.putInternal / MeteredWindowStore.getInternal are never 
> used since only its inner will trigger this function. So how about 
> refactoring this piece as follows:
> 1. WindowStore only expose two APIs: put(K, V) and get(K, long).
> 2. Add a RollingRocksDBStores that does not extend any interface, but only 
> implements putInternal, getInternal and putAndReturnInternalKey that uses 
> underlying RocksDBStore<byte[], byte[]> as Segments.
> 3. RocksDBWindowStore implements WindowStore with an RollingRocksDBStores 
> inner.
> 4. Let MeteredXXStore only maintain the metrics recording logic, and let 
> different stores implement their own logging logic, since this is now 
> different across different types and are better handled separately. Also some 
> types of stores may not even have a loggingEnabled flag, if it will always 
> log, or will never log.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to