[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15129644#comment-15129644
]
Jiangjie Qin commented on KAFKA-3174:
-------------------------------------
[~ijuma] Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I agree we'd better run a
parameterized test to see what is the performance difference between current
Crc32 and Java CRC32. But I might be busy in the next a few days. So please
feel free to take this ticket if you are interested. Thanks.
> Re-evaluate the CRC32 class performance.
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-3174
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3174
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0.0
> Reporter: Jiangjie Qin
> Assignee: Jiangjie Qin
> Fix For: 0.9.1.0
>
>
> We used org.apache.kafka.common.utils.CRC32 in clients because it has better
> performance than java.util.zip.CRC32 in Java 1.6.
> In a recent test I ran it looks in Java 1.8 the CRC32 class is 2x as fast as
> the Crc32 class we are using now. We may want to re-evaluate the performance
> of Crc32 class and see it makes sense to simply use java CRC32 instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
