+1.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > The new Java producer was introduced in 0.8.2.0 (released in
> February
> > > > > 2015). It has become the default implementation for various tools
> > since
> > > > > 0.9.0.0 (released in October 2015) and it is the only
> implementation
> > > with
> > > > > support for the security features introduced in 0.9.0.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given this, I think we should deprecate the old Scala producers for
> > > > > 0.10.0.0 by adding @deprecated annotations in the code and updating
> > the
> > > > the
> > > > > documentation to encourage usage of the new Java producer. This
> would
> > > > give
> > > > > our users a stronger signal regarding our plans to focus on the new
> > > Java
> > > > > producer going forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that this proposal is only about deprecating the old Scala
> > > > producers as,
> > > > > in my opinion, it is too early to do the same for the old Scala
> > > > consumers. The
> > > > > new Java consumer was only introduced in 0.9.0.0 and it's still
> > marked
> > > as
> > > > > beta. It would be good to have a full release cycle where the new
> > > > consumer
> > > > > is no longer in beta before we deprecate the old consumers. We are
> > > hoping
> > > > > to remove the beta label for the consumer for 0.10.0.0, but that's
> a
> > > > > separate discussion.
> > > > >
> > > > > With regards to removal of the deprecated producers, the current
> > > thinking
> > > > > is to remove all Scala clients at the same time, so it will take at
> > > least
> > > > > two non bug-fix release cycles (it could take longer depending on
> > > users'
> > > > > feedback).
> > > > >
> > > > > The feedback was mostly positive in the discuss thread although
> some
> > > > points
> > > > > were raised about deprecating the old producers before deprecating
> > the
> > > > old
> > > > > consumers:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/uyzND1KVJJmcbgAf2&subj=+DISCUSS+Deprecating+the+old+Scala+producers+for+the+next+release
> > > > >
> > > > > The JIRA for tracking this is KAFKA-2982.
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will run for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ashish
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Henke
> Software Engineer | Cloudera
> gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>



-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to