correcting my mistake - the proposal is wire-compatible, but not source compatible for some calls. My vote remains though.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 > > I want to clarify that the compatibility issue is only for unshaded > dependencies. Code and wire protocol will be compatible. > > Gwen > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > >> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-45. We've discussed several alternatives >> on the mailing list and in the KIP call, but this vote is only on the >> documented KIP: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61337336. >> This >> change will not be compatible with 0.9, but it will provide a cleaner API >> long term for users to work with. This is really the last chance to make >> an >> incompatible change like this with 0.10 shortly on the way, but compatible >> options (such as method overloading) could be brought up again in the >> future if we find it's needed. >> >> Thanks, >> Jason >> > >
