This can be discussed in the review. If there's good test coverage, is low risk and passes review and gets merged before Monday morning...
We won't be doing an extra release candidate just for this though. Gwen On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Rajini Sivaram < rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Gwen, > > Is it still possible to include this in 0.10.0.0? > > Thanks, > > Rajini > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Sorry! Got distracted by the impending release! > > > > +1 on the current revision of the KIP. > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the > > > pluggable classes we should make a move on this. > > > > > > Rajini, > > > Can you restart the voting thread. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Harsha > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > > > As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the scope of KIP-43 has > been > > > > reduced so that it can be integrated into 0.10.0.0. The updated KIP > is > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43%3A+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > . > > > > > > > > Can we continue the vote on the updated KIP? > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Harsha, > > > > > > > > > > Since you are clearly in favor of the KIP, do you mind jumping into > > > > > the discussion thread and help me understand the decision behind > the > > > > > configuration parameters only allowing a single Login and > > > > > CallbackHandler class? This seems too limiting to me, and while > > Rajini > > > > > is trying hard to convince me otherwise, I remain doubtful. Perhaps > > > > > (since we have similar experience with Hadoop), you can help me see > > > > > what I am missing. > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield < > > > > > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > >> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk > > > > > >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:52:11 +0000 > > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-43: Kafka SASL enhancements > > > > > >> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > > > >> > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> I would like to start the voting process for *KIP-43: Kafka > > > SASL > > > > > >> > >> enhancements*. This KIP extends the SASL implementation in > > > Kafka to > > > > > >> > support > > > > > >> > >> new SASL mechanisms to enable Kafka to be integrated with > > > different > > > > > >> > >> authentication servers. > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> The KIP is available here for reference: > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-43:+Kafka+SASL+enhancements > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> And here's is a link to the discussion on the mailing list: > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAOJcB39b9Vy7%3DZEM3tLw2zarCS4A_s-%2BU%2BC%3DuEcWs0712UaYrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Thank you... > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Rajini > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajini >
