[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ismael Juma reopened KAFKA-3704:
--------------------------------

> Improve mechanism for compression stream block size selection in KafkaProducer
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-3704
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3704
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Guozhang Wang
>            Assignee: Ismael Juma
>
> As discovered in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3565, the 
> current default block size (1K) used in Snappy and GZIP may cause a 
> sub-optimal compression ratio for Snappy, and hence reduce throughput. 
> Because we no longer recompress data in the broker, it also impacts what gets 
> stored on disk.
> A solution might be to use the default block size, which is 64K in LZ4, 32K 
> in Snappy and 0.5K in GZIP. The downside is that this solution will require 
> more memory allocated outside of the buffer pool and hence users may need to 
> bump up their JVM heap size, especially for MirrorMakers. Using Snappy as an 
> example, it's an additional 2x32k per batch (as Snappy uses two buffers) and 
> one would expect at least one batch per partition. However, the number of 
> batches per partition can be much higher if the broker is slow to acknowledge 
> producer requests (depending on `buffer.memory`, `batch.size`, message size, 
> etc.).
> Given the above, it seems like a configuration may be needed as the there is 
> no one size fits all. An alternative to a new config is to allocate buffers 
> from the buffer pool and pass them to the compression library. This is 
> possible with Snappy and we could adapt our LZ4 code. It's not possible with 
> GZIP, but it uses a very small buffer by default.
> Note that we decided that this change was too risky for 0.10.0.0 and reverted 
> the original attempt.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to