+1 (binding)

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Dana Powers <dana.pow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 -- thanks for the update
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > I have update the patch and wiki based on the feedback in the discussion
> > thread. The only change is that instead of logging and disconnecting in
> the
> > case of invalid messages (duplicate topics or both arguments) we now
> return
> > and InvalidRequest error back to the client for that topic.
> >
> > I would like to restart the vote now including that change. If you have
> > already voted, please revote in this thread.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Grant
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
> e...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Don't necessarily want to add noise here, but I'm -1 based on the
> >> disconnect part. See discussion in other thread. (I'm +1 otherwise, and
> >> happy to have my vote applied assuming we clean up that one issue.)
> >>
> >> -Ewen
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1 (binding)
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Harsha
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 04:15 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> >> > > +1.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > +1 (binding)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Grant Henke <
> ghe...@cloudera.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I would like to initiate the voting process for the "KIP-4
> Create
> >> > Topics
> >> > > > > Schema changes". This is not a vote for all of KIP-4, but
> >> > specifically
> >> > > > for
> >> > > > > the create topics changes. I have included the exact changes
> below
> >> > for
> >> > > > > clarity:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Create Topics Request (KAFKA-2945
> >> > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2945>)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > CreateTopics Request (Version: 0) => [create_topic_requests]
> >> > timeout
> >> > > > > >   create_topic_requests => topic num_partitions
> >> replication_factor
> >> > > > > [replica_assignment] [configs]
> >> > > > > >     topic => STRING
> >> > > > > >     num_partitions => INT32
> >> > > > > >     replication_factor => INT16
> >> > > > > >     replica_assignment => partition_id [replicas]
> >> > > > > >       partition_id => INT32
> >> > > > > >       replicas => INT32
> >> > > > > >     configs => config_key config_value
> >> > > > > >       config_key => STRING
> >> > > > > >       config_value => STRING
> >> > > > > >   timeout => INT32
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > CreateTopicsRequest is a batch request to initiate topic
> creation
> >> > with
> >> > > > > > either predefined or automatic replica assignment and
> optionally
> >> > topic
> >> > > > > > configuration.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Request semantics:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >    1. Must be sent to the controller broker
> >> > > > > >    2. If there are multiple instructions for the same topic in
> >> one
> >> > > > > >    request an InvalidRequestException will be logged on the
> >> broker
> >> > and
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > >    client will be disconnected.
> >> > > > > >       - This is because the list of topics is modeled server
> side
> >> > as a
> >> > > > > >       map with TopicName as the key
> >> > > > > >    3. The principal must be authorized to the "Create"
> Operation
> >> > on the
> >> > > > > >    "Cluster" resource to create topics.
> >> > > > > >       - Unauthorized requests will receive a
> >> > > > > ClusterAuthorizationException
> >> > > > > >    4.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >    Only one from ReplicaAssignment or (num_partitions +
> >> > > > > replication_factor
> >> > > > > >    ), can be defined in one instruction.
> >> > > > > >    - If both parameters are specified an
> InvalidRequestException
> >> > will
> >> > > > be
> >> > > > > >       logged on the broker and the client will be
> disconnected.
> >> > > > > >       - In the case ReplicaAssignment is defined number of
> >> > partitions
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > > >       replicas will be calculated from the supplied
> >> > replica_assignment.
> >> > > > > >       - In the case of defined (num_partitions +
> >> > replication_factor)
> >> > > > > >       replica assignment will be automatically generated by
> the
> >> > server.
> >> > > > > >       - One or the other must be defined. The existing broker
> >> side
> >> > auto
> >> > > > > >       create defaults will not be used
> >> > > > > >       (default.replication.factor, num.partitions). The client
> >> > > > > implementation can
> >> > > > > >       have defaults for these options when generating the
> >> messages.
> >> > > > > >       - The first replica in [replicas] is assumed to be the
> >> > preferred
> >> > > > > >       leader. This matches current behavior elsewhere.
> >> > > > > >    5. Setting a timeout > 0 will allow the request to block
> until
> >> > the
> >> > > > > >    topic metadata is "complete" on the controller node.
> >> > > > > >       - Complete means the local topic metadata cache been
> >> > completely
> >> > > > > >       populated and all partitions have leaders
> >> > > > > >          - The topic metadata is updated when the controller
> >> sends
> >> > out
> >> > > > > >          update metadata requests to the brokers
> >> > > > > >       - If a timeout error occurs, the topic could still be
> >> created
> >> > > > > >       successfully at a later time. Its up to the client to
> query
> >> > for
> >> > > > > the state
> >> > > > > >       at that point.
> >> > > > > >    6. Setting a timeout <= 0 will validate arguments and
> trigger
> >> > the
> >> > > > > >    create topics and return immediately.
> >> > > > > >       - This is essentially the fully asynchronous mode we
> have
> >> in
> >> > the
> >> > > > > >       Zookeeper tools today.
> >> > > > > >       - The error code in the response will either contain an
> >> > argument
> >> > > > > >       validation exception or a timeout exception. If you
> >> receive a
> >> > > > > timeout
> >> > > > > >       exception, because you asked for 0 timeout, you can
> assume
> >> > the
> >> > > > > message was
> >> > > > > >       valid and the topic creation was triggered.
> >> > > > > >    7. The request is not transactional.
> >> > > > > >       1. If an error occurs on one topic, the others could
> still
> >> be
> >> > > > > >       created.
> >> > > > > >       2. Errors are reported independently.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > QA:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >    - Why is CreateTopicsRequest a batch request?
> >> > > > > >       - Scenarios where tools or admins want to create many
> >> topics
> >> > > > should
> >> > > > > >       be able to with fewer requests
> >> > > > > >       - Example: MirrorMaker may want to create the topics
> >> > downstream
> >> > > > > >    - What happens if some topics error immediately? Will it
> >> > > > > >    return immediately?
> >> > > > > >       - The request will block until all topics have either
> been
> >> > > > created,
> >> > > > > >       errors, or the timeout has been hit
> >> > > > > >       - There is no "short circuiting" where 1 error stops the
> >> > other
> >> > > > > >       topics from being created
> >> > > > > >    - Why implement "partial blocking" instead of fully async
> or
> >> > fully
> >> > > > > >    consistent?
> >> > > > > >       - See Cluster Consistent Blocking
> >> > > > > >       <
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-4+-+Command+line+and+centralized+administrative+operations#KIP-4-Commandlineandcentralizedadministrativeoperations-cluster-consistent-blocking
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >        below
> >> > > > > >    - Why require the request to go to the controller?
> >> > > > > >       - The controller is responsible for the cluster metadata
> >> and
> >> > its
> >> > > > > >       propagation
> >> > > > > >       - See Request Forwarding
> >> > > > > >       <
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-4+-+Command+line+and+centralized+administrative+operations#KIP-4-Commandlineandcentralizedadministrativeoperations-request
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >        below
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Create Topics Response
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > CreateTopics Response (Version: 0) => [topic_error_codes]
> >> > > > > >   topic_error_codes => topic error_code
> >> > > > > >     topic => STRING
> >> > > > > >     error_code => INT16
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > CreateTopicsResponse contains a map between topic and topic
> >> > creation
> >> > > > > > result error code (see New Protocol Errors
> >> > > > > > <
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-4+-+Command+line+and+centralized+administrative+operations#KIP-4-Commandlineandcentralizedadministrativeoperations-NewProtocolErrors
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > ).
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > The KIP is available here for reference (linked to the Create
> >> Topics
> >> > > > schema
> >> > > > > section):
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-4+-+Command+line+and+centralized+administrative+operations#KIP-4-Commandlineandcentralizedadministrativeoperations-CreateTopicsRequest(KAFKA-2945)
> >> > > > > <
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-4+-+Command+line+and+centralized+administrative+operations#KIP-4-Commandlineandcentralizedadministrativeoperations-CreateTopicsRequest(KAFKA-2945)
> >> > > > > >*
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > A pull request is available implementing the proposed changes
> here:
> >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1489
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Here is a link to the past discussion on the mailing list:
> >> > > > > *
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/uyzND1rfG6v1oixmZ&subj=+DISCUSS+KIP+4+Create+Topic+Schema
> >> > > > > <
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/uyzND1rfG6v1oixmZ&subj=+DISCUSS+KIP+4+Create+Topic+Schema
> >> > > > > >*
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thank you,
> >> > > > > Grant
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Grant Henke
> >> > > > > Software Engineer | Cloudera
> >> > > > > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke |
> >> > linkedin.com/in/granthenke
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > -- Guozhang
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ewen
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant Henke
> > Software Engineer | Cloudera
> > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>

Reply via email to