Hi,
The vote is now complete and KIP-67 has been accepted and adopted.
Thanks everyone for the input etc.

Regards,
Damian

On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 at 06:53 Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Jay's interpretation is correct.
> Thanks,
> Damian
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 at 16:10, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
>> My interpretation was that you need an implementation of
>> QueryableStoreType<T> which anyone can do and QueryableStoreTypes is just
>> a
>> place to put the type objects for the types we ship with Kafka.
>>
>> -Jay
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Sriram Subramanian <r...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So, it looks like QueryableStoreTypes would be part of the streams
>> library,
>> > right? If a developer needs to support a new store, would they need to
>> > change code in streams?
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Cool, I'm +1 after the updates.
>> > >
>> > > -Jay
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Guozhang, KIP updated.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Damian
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 at 13:15 Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Damian,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Since the StateStoreProvider is moved into internal packages, how
>> > about
>> > > > > just keeping the ReadOnlyXXStores interface for the queryAPI, and
>> > > > > "QueryableStoreType" in the discoverAPI, and move the
>> > > StateStoreProvider
>> > > > > / QueryableStoreTypeMatcher and different implementations of the
>> > > matcher
>> > > > > like KeyValueStoreType / etc in a new section called "developer
>> guide
>> > > for
>> > > > > customized stores"? This way we have a separate guidance for
>> Streams
>> > > > users,
>> > > > > from Streams developers.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Other than that, all LGTM.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Guozhang
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi All,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I've updated the KIP with changes as discussed in this Thread.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > Damian
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 16:51 Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I think it's important to distinguish the use cases of
>> defining
>> > new
>> > > > > > stores
>> > > > > > > (somewhat rare) versus using the `store` method (very common).
>> > The
>> > > > > > strategy
>> > > > > > > employed here is a common way to use generics to ensure type
>> > safety
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > latter case. In the former case, there are all sorts of weird
>> > > things
>> > > > > one
>> > > > > > > could do to defeat the type system, but spending a bit more
>> > effort
>> > > to
>> > > > > get
>> > > > > > > it right so that the common case is safer and more pleasant is
>> > > worth
>> > > > > it,
>> > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > my opinion.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Ismael
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Damian Guy <
>> > damian....@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Yes, you get compile time errors
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 16:22 Damian Guy <
>> damian....@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > You wont get a runtime error as you wouldn't find a store
>> of
>> > > that
>> > > > > > type.
>> > > > > > > > > The API would return null
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 16:22 Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >> But if "my-store" is not of type MyStoreType don't you
>> still
>> > > > get a
>> > > > > > run
>> > > > > > > > >> time
>> > > > > > > > >> error that in effect is the same as the class cast would
>> be?
>> > > > > > Basically
>> > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > >> question I'm asking is whether this added complexity is
>> > > actually
>> > > > > > > moving
>> > > > > > > > >> runtime errors to compile time errors.
>> > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > > >> -Jay
>> > > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > -- Guozhang
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to