[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15456584#comment-15456584
 ] 

Vahid Hashemian edited comment on KAFKA-3144 at 9/1/16 8:56 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

[~junrao] How do you think the consumer group coordinator (I assume the broker 
id is sufficient) should be displayed in the output?
One option would be in a new {{COORDINATOR}} column (which repeats the same id 
in each row similar to how group name gets repeated):
{code}
GROUP    COORDINATOR    TOPIC   PARTITION  CURRENT-OFFSET  LOG-END-OFFSET  LAG  
  MEMBER-ID     MEMBER-HOST  CLIENT-ID
group1   0              bar    0          445             445             0     
 group1_kafka-1472762710305-24f2ffa3                                            
  
{code}



was (Author: vahid):
[~junrao] How do you think the consumer group coordinator (I assume the broker 
id is sufficient) should be displayed in the output?
One option would be in a new {{COORDINATOR}} column (which repeats the same id 
in each row similar to how group name gets repeated):
{code}
GROUP        COORDINATOR      TOPIC     PARTITION  CURRENT-OFFSET  
LOG-END-OFFSET  LAG    MEMBER-ID                             MEMBER-HOST     
CLIENT-ID
group1       0                bar       0          445             445          
   0      group1_kafka-1472762710305-24f2ffa3                                   
           
{code}


> report members with no assigned partitions in ConsumerGroupCommand
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-3144
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3144
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Jun Rao
>            Assignee: Vahid Hashemian
>              Labels: newbie
>
> A couple of suggestions on improving ConsumerGroupCommand. 
> 1. It would be useful to list members with no assigned partitions when doing 
> describe in ConsumerGroupCommand.
> 2. Currently, we show the client.id of each member when doing describe in 
> ConsumerGroupCommand. Since client.id is supposed to be the logical 
> application id, all members in the same group are supposed to set the same 
> client.id. So, it would be clearer if we show the client id as well as the 
> member id.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to