Hey Ismael,

I probably replied too late, but is it possible to add KIP-79 to the agenda
as well?

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:57 AM, radai <radai.rosenbl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'd like to discuss KIP-72. could you please add me?
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vahid,
> >
> > Sounds good. Jun is unavailable on the day, so I'll send the invite. Any
> > other KIPs that people would like to discuss on the day (Tuesday at 11am
> > PT)? The following KIPs are under discussion and have either been
> submitted
> > or updated recently:
> >
> > KIP-68: Add a consumed log retention before log retention
> > KIP-72: Allow Sizing Incoming Request Queue in Bytes
> > KIP-79: ListOffsetRequest/ListOffsetResponse v1 and add timestamp search
> > methods to the new consumer
> >
> > If the authors of any KIPs are available and interested to discuss them
> on
> > the next KIP call, please let me know so that I can add them to the
> agenda.
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
> > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to add KIP-54 to the agenda for next KIP meeting.
> > > This KIP has been in discussion phase for a long time, and it would be
> > > nice to have an online discussion about it, collect additional
> feedback,
> > > and move forward, if possible.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --Vahid
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to