[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15788677#comment-15788677
 ] 

Ewen Cheslack-Postava commented on KAFKA-3135:
----------------------------------------------

[~jeffwidman] I've updated the affected versions, and I'll track this for the 
0.10.2.0 release. Do we have an idea of how critical this issue is? It seems 
like it should be hit fairly commonly (based on ideas that it's due to TCP 
persist timer issues), but we've seen few comments since Mar/Apr of earlier 
this year. Is this still a critical issue or should we downgrade it to 
something that would be a good improvement and make it a 
major/minor/nice-to-have?

> Unexpected delay before fetch response transmission
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-3135
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3135
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0.0, 0.10.1.0, 0.9.0.1, 0.10.0.0, 0.10.0.1, 0.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Jason Gustafson
>            Assignee: Jason Gustafson
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.10.2.0
>
>
> From the user list, Krzysztof Ciesielski reports the following:
> {quote}
> Scenario description:
> First, a producer writes 500000 elements into a topic
> Then, a consumer starts to read, polling in a loop.
> When "max.partition.fetch.bytes" is set to a relatively small value, each
> "consumer.poll()" returns a batch of messages.
> If this value is left as default, the output tends to look like this:
> Poll returned 13793 elements
> Poll returned 13793 elements
> Poll returned 13793 elements
> Poll returned 13793 elements
> Poll returned 0 elements
> Poll returned 0 elements
> Poll returned 0 elements
> Poll returned 0 elements
> Poll returned 13793 elements
> Poll returned 13793 elements
> As we can see, there are weird "gaps" when poll returns 0 elements for some
> time. What is the reason for that? Maybe there are some good practices
> about setting "max.partition.fetch.bytes" which I don't follow?
> {quote}
> The gist to reproduce this problem is here: 
> https://gist.github.com/kciesielski/054bb4359a318aa17561.
> After some initial investigation, the delay appears to be in the server's 
> networking layer. Basically I see a delay of 5 seconds from the time that 
> Selector.send() is invoked in SocketServer.Processor with the fetch response 
> to the time that the send is completed. Using netstat in the middle of the 
> delay shows the following output:
> {code}
> tcp4       0      0  10.191.0.30.55455      10.191.0.30.9092       ESTABLISHED
> tcp4       0 102400  10.191.0.30.9092       10.191.0.30.55454      ESTABLISHED
> {code}
> From this, it looks like the data reaches the send buffer, but needs to be 
> flushed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to