+1 from me too. Ismael
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 > > Since this is an unusual one, I think it's worth pointing out that the KIP > notes it is really a bug fix, but since it has compatibility implications > the KIP was worth it. It was a sort of intentional bug, but confusing and > dangerous. > > Seems important to fix this ASAP since people are hitting this in practice > and would have to go out of their way to set up monitoring to catch the > issue. > > -Ewen > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > +1 from me. The current behavior seems both surprising and dangerous. > > > > -Jason > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Onur Karaman < > > onurkaraman.apa...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey everyone. > > > > > > I made a bug-fix KIP-115 to enforce offsets.topic.replication.factor: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > 115%3A+Enforce+offsets.topic.replication.factor > > > > > > Comments are welcome. > > > > > > - Onur > > > > > >
