+1 (binding). Cheers.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I don't think this solves all the stickiness/incremental rebalancing > problems we'll eventually want to address, but it's a nice improvement, > would be a benefit for a fair number of applications, and as it's a clean > extension to the existing options it doesn't come with any significant > compatibility concerns. > > (Also, this should bump this thread, which Jeff Widman was wondering about. > It's lacking at least 1 more binding vote before it could pass.) > > -Ewen > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Mickael Maison <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Bill Bejeck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Jason Gustafson <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me. > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Vahid S Hashemian < > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi all, > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks for providing feedback on this KIP so far. > > >> > > The KIP was discussed during the KIP meeting today and there > doesn't > > >> seem > > >> > > to be any unaddressed issue at this point. > > >> > > > > >> > > So I would like to initiate the voting process. > > >> > > > > >> > > The KIP can be found here: > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > >> > > 54+-+Sticky+Partition+Assignment+Strategy > > >> > > And the full discussion thread is here: > > >> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg47607.html > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks. > > >> > > --Vahid > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Rajini > > >> > > > -- -- Guozhang
