Hi, it looks like I have 2 of the 3 minimum votes, can a third voter please consider this KIP? Thanks.
(PS - new revision on GitHub PR with hopefully the last round of improvements) > On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > > +1 > > On 2/8/17 4:51 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote: >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Steven Schlansker >> <sschlans...@opentable.com> wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Thank you for constructive feedback on KIP-121, >>> KStream.peek(ForeachAction<K, V>) ; >>> it seems like it is time to call a vote which I hope will pass easily :) >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-121%3A+Add+KStream+peek+method >>> >>> I believe the PR attached is already in good shape to consider merging: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2493 >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Steven >>> >> >> >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
