Hi Jeff,

I share your desire to streamline the experience and remove options that
don't make sense to new users. I should, however, point out that we won't
be able to remove the old consumers in 0.11.0.0 as they haven't been
deprecated yet. Hopefully that will happen in 0.12.0.0/1.0.0.

Ismael

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Jeff Widman <j...@netskope.com> wrote:

> +1 for major version bump.
>
> A good bit of deprecated code I would like to see removed especially on old
> consumer side plus a few other settings defaults changed such as the brief
> discussion on mirrormaker options a few months back. Just be good to
> continue to make the new user experience a lot more streamlined so they're
> not wondering about all these variations on consumers, CLI scripts etc.
>
> On Feb 27, 2017 8:14 PM, "Becket Qin" <becket....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ismael,
> >
> > Thanks for volunteering on the new release.
> >
> > I think 0.11.0.0 makes a lot of sense given the new big features we are
> > intended to include.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > With 0.10.2.0 out of the way, I would like to volunteer to be the
> release
> > > manager for our next time-based release. See
> https://cwiki.apache.org/c
> > > onfluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan if you missed previous
> > > communication on time-based releases or need a reminder.
> > >
> > > I put together a draft release plan with June 2017 as the release month
> > (as
> > > previously agreed) and a list of KIPs that have already been voted:
> > >
> > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> > action?pageId=68716876
> > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> > action?pageId=68716876
> > > >*
> > >
> > > I haven't set exact dates for the various stages (feature freeze, code
> > > freeze, etc.) for now as Ewen is going to send out an email with some
> > > suggested tweaks based on his experience as release manager for
> 0.10.2.0.
> > > We can set the exact dates after that discussion.
> > >
> > > As we are starting the process early this time, we should expect the
> > number
> > > of KIPs in the plan to grow (so don't worry if your KIP is not there
> > yet),
> > > but it's good to see that we already have 10 (including 2 merged and 2
> > with
> > > PR reviews in progress).
> > >
> > > Out of the KIPs listed, KIP-98 (Exactly-once and Transactions) and
> > KIP-101
> > > (Leader Generation in Replication) require message format changes,
> which
> > > typically imply a major version bump (i.e. 0.11.0.0). If we do that,
> then
> > > it makes sense to also include KIP-106 (Unclean leader election should
> be
> > > false by default) and KIP-118 (Drop support for Java 7). We would also
> > take
> > > the chance to remove deprecated code, in that case.
> > >
> > > Given the above, how do people feel about 0.11.0.0 as the next Kafka
> > > version? Please share your thoughts.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ismael
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to