[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988365#comment-15988365
 ] 

james chien edited comment on KAFKA-4772 at 4/28/17 9:19 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

I think I know it.
This idea is good, and we want to improve `KStreamPeek` by adding flag to do 
like `KStreamForeach` which do not go dowstream processors.
So, it means we want to do like `#peek(flag)` to decide whether forwarding the 
data or not.


was (Author: james.c):
I think I know it.
This idea is good, and we want to improve `KStreamPeek` by adding flag to do 
like `KStreamForeach`.
So, it means we want to do like `#peek(flag)` to decide whether forwarding the 
data or not.

> Exploit #peek to implement #print() and other methods
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-4772
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4772
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
>            Assignee: james chien
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: beginner, newbie
>
> From: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2493#pullrequestreview-22157555
> Things that I can think of:
> - print / writeAsTest can be a special impl of peek; KStreamPrint etc can be 
> removed.
> - consider collapse KStreamPeek with KStreamForeach with a flag parameter 
> indicating if the acted key-value pair should still be forwarded.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to