Hi, Xavier, I think the per topic metric is more useful for measuring the traffic from the clients. For internal replication, perhaps the aggregate value is enough.
Thanks, Jun On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Xavier Léauté <xav...@confluent.io> wrote: > Any reason we are not keeping the per-topic breakdown for inter-broker > traffic? > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:52 PM Onur Karaman <onurkaraman.apa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Looks good. Thanks! > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Very helpful. Thank you, Jun. > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Jun, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, LGTM. > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Jun, looks good to me. > > > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Ismael, > > > > > > > > > > > > Good point. Updated the KIP with ReplicationBytesInPerSec. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Jun. Good to fix this inconsistency. Do I > > > > > understand > > > > > > > correctly that we are introducing ReplicationBytesOutPerSec, > but > > > not > > > > > > > ReplicationBytesInPerSec? > > > > > > > If so, what's the reason? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:11 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We created "KIP-153 : Include only client traffic in > > > BytesOutPerSec > > > > > > > > metric". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > > > > > 153+%3A+Include+only+client+traffic+in+BytesOutPerSec+metric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please take a look and provide your feedback. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > >
