[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034461#comment-16034461
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-5368:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user hrafzali opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3206

    KAFKA-5368 Kafka Streams skipped-records-rate sensor bug

    This resolved the issue with Kafka Streams skipped records sensor reporting 
wrong values.
    
    Jira ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5368
    
    The contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project 
under the project's open source license.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/hrafzali/kafka 
KAFKA-5368_skipped-records-sensor-bug

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3206.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #3206
    
----
commit db4e424c55d63b9172de563fb559002f435b7f01
Author: Hamidreza Afzali <hrafz...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-06-02T09:43:32Z

    KAFKA-5368 Kafka Streams skipped-records-rate sensor bug

----


> Kafka Streams skipped-records-rate sensor produces nonzero values when the 
> timestamps are valid
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-5368
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5368
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Hamidreza Afzali
>            Assignee: Hamidreza Afzali
>
> Kafka Streams skipped-records-rate sensor produces nonzero values even when 
> the timestamps are valid and records are processed. The values are equal to 
> poll-rate.
> Related issue: KAFKA-5055 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to