Hi Paolo, I don't have an opinion about which you should use, but I certainly agree that two option parsing dependencies appears to be 1 too many.
Is there a reason why you prefer joptsimple? Cheers, Tom On 10 July 2017 at 08:38, Paolo Patierno <ppatie...@live.com> wrote: > Hi devs, > > > working on re-writing the TopicCommand tool in Java using the Admin > Client, I was asking if there is any specific reason why the Scala tools > use joptsimple for parsing command line arguments while the current Java > based tools use argparse4j. > > I'd like to use the joptsimple even for the "new" Java based tools. What > do you think ? > > > Thanks, > > Paolo. > > > Paolo Patierno > Senior Software Engineer (IoT) @ Red Hat > Microsoft MVP on Windows Embedded & IoT > Microsoft Azure Advisor > > Twitter : @ppatierno<http://twitter.com/ppatierno> > Linkedin : paolopatierno<http://it.linkedin.com/in/paolopatierno> > Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/> >
