Hu, The vote period is supposed to give people who might still want to vote -1 a chance to do so, so we'd leave it open until at least 72 hours after the vote was initiated.
However, now that enough time has passed feel free to close the vote and move the KIP to Adopted. I'll give it a +1 as well. By the way, I noticed that the KIP was accidentally created under the ARIES space in Confluence. Could we move it to the right location under the KAFKA space? It's not a huge deal since it's linked from the KIP page, but it doesn't show up in the navbar on the left when you're browsing the wiki since it isn't in the same space. -Ewen On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Hu Xi <huxi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, a naive question please. Since this KIP already collects four > binding +1 votes, could we mark it as Accepted and move it under 'Adopted > KIPs'? Thanks > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > 发件人: Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > 发送时间: 2017年8月5日 2:55 > > 收件人: dev@kafka.apache.org > > 主题: Re: [VOTE] KIP-177: Consumer perf tool should count rebalance time > > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > >> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding) > >> > >> Ismael > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Hu Xi <huxi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > > >> > I'd like to kick off the vote for KIP-177: https://cwiki.apache.org/ > >> > confluence/display/ARIES/KIP-177%3A+Consumer+perf+tool+ > >> > should+count+rebalance+time. > >> > > >> > > >> > A PR for this KIP can be found at <https://github.com/apache/ > >> > kafka/pull/3188> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3188 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang >