Sure, we do that for every PR anyway (i.e. we manage risk on a continuous
scale - even if it's before the feature freeze). I am happy to cc you on
any Core PR that we may consider after the feature freeze.

Ismael

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the reminder Ismael. I think after this Wednesday for
> KIP-related PRs we need to discuss case-by-case to estimate its impact on
> regression.
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi Guozhang,
> >
> > Note that our documentation for the time-based release plan says the
> > following about what happens after the feature freeze:
> >
> > "We will leave another week for "minor" features to get in (see below for
> > definitions), but at this point we will start efforts to stabilize the
> > release branch and contribute mostly tests and fixes"
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Time+
> Based+Release+Plan
> >
> > So, minor KIPs can still be double committed after Wednesday. We should
> > only do that if we are confident that they won't cause stabilisation
> issues
> > though.
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > This is a heads up on 1.0.0 progress post the KIP-deadline:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> > action?pageId=71764913
> > >
> > >
> > > In this release we have a total of 33 KIPs either newly adopted or
> > > inherited from the previous release. Among them 15 KIPs has been merged
> > to
> > > trunk, and others are still ongoing / under reviews.
> > >
> > > Please note that the feature freeze deadline is Sept. 20th (next
> > > Wednesday), and after that deadline any accepted KIPs will be pushed to
> > the
> > > next minor release. For those KIP proposer / guiding committer: if you
> > are
> > > confident that the KIP's PRs can be merged to trunk, please make sure
> to
> > do
> > > so before next Wednesday.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -- Guozhang
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to