Hi team, Are there any more votes ? Thanks
Le 12 sept. 2017 20:18, "Gwen Shapira" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Thanks for clarifying. > > +1 again :) > > > > On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:57 AM Randall Hauch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Gwen, > > > > I've had more time to look into the code. First, the OffsetStorageReader > > JavaDoc says: "OffsetStorageReader provides access to the offset storage > > used by sources. This can be used by connectors to determine offsets to > > start consuming data from. This is most commonly used during > initialization > > of a task, but can also be used during runtime, e.g. when reconfiguring a > > task." > > > > Second, this KIP allows the SourceConnector implementations to access the > > OffsetStorageReader, but really the SourceConnector methods are *only* > > related to lifecycle changes when using the OffsetStorageReader would be > > appropriate per the comment above. > > > > In summary, I don't think there is any concern about the > > OffsetStorageReader being used inappropriate by the SourceConnector > > implementations. > > > > Randall > > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Gwen Shapira <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Basically, you are saying that the part where the comment says: "Offset > > > data should only be read during startup or reconfiguration of a task." > > > is incorrect? because the API extension allows reading offset data at > any > > > point in the lifecycle, right? > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:18 AM Florian Hussonnois < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Shapira, > > > > > > > > We only expose the OffsetStorageReader to connector which relies on > > > > KafkaOffsetBackingStore. The store continuesly consumes offsets from > > > kafka > > > > so I think we can't have stale data. > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 8 sept. 2017 06:13, "Randall Hauch" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > The KIP and PR expose the OffsetStorageReader, which is already > > exposed > > > > to > > > > > the tasks. The OffsetStorageWriter is part of the implementation, > but > > > was > > > > > not and is not exposed thru the API. > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 7, 2017, at 9:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I just re-read the code for the OffsetStorageWriter, and ran into > > > this > > > > > > comment: > > > > > > > > > > > > * Note that this only provides write functionality. This is > > > > > > intentional to ensure stale data is > > > > > > * never read. Offset data should only be read during startup or > > > > > > reconfiguration of a task. By > > > > > > * always serving those requests by reading the values from the > > > backing > > > > > > store, we ensure we never > > > > > > * accidentally use stale data. (One example of how this can > occur: > > a > > > > > > task is processing input > > > > > > * partition A, writing offsets; reconfiguration causes partition > A > > to > > > > > > be reassigned elsewhere; > > > > > > * reconfiguration causes partition A to be reassigned to this > node, > > > > > > but now the offset data is out > > > > > > * of date). Since these offsets are created and managed by the > > > > > > connector itself, there's no way > > > > > > * for the offset management layer to know which keys are "owned" > by > > > > > > which tasks at any given > > > > > > * time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't figure out how the KIP avoids the stale-reads problem > > > explained > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you talk me through it? I'm cancelling my vote since right > now > > > > > > exposing this interface sounds risky and misleading. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:04 PM Gwen Shapira <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Looking forward to see how connector implementations use this in > > > > > practice > > > > > >> :) > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM Randall Hauch <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> I'd like to open the vote for KIP-131: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-131+-+ > > > > > Add+access+to+OffsetStorageReader+from+SourceConnector > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Thanks to Florian for submitting the KIP and the > implementation, > > > and > > > > to > > > > > >>> everyone else that helped review. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Best regards, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Randall > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
