Hey Clebert, Is there a motivation for adding a second way? We generally try to avoid having two ways to do something unless it's really needed...I suspect you have a reason for wanting this, though.
-Jay On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:15 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > At ActiveMQ and ActiveMQ Artemis, ConnectionFactories have an > interesting feature where you can pass parameters through an URI. > > I was looking at Producer and Consumer APIs, and these two classes are > using a method that I considered old for Artemis resembling HornetQ: > > Instead of passing a Properties (aka HashMaps), users would be able to > create a Consumer or Producer by simply doing: > > new Consumer("tcp::/host:port?properties=values;properties=values...etc"); > > Example: > > > Instead of the following: > > Map<String, Object> config = new HashMap<>(); > config.put(ConsumerConfig.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, "localhost:9999"); > config.put(ConsumerConfig.RECEIVE_BUFFER_CONFIG, -2); > new KafkaConsumer<>(config, new ByteArrayDeserializer(), new > ByteArrayDeserializer()); > > > > Someone could do > > new KafkaConsumer<>("tcp://localhost:9999?receive.buffer.bytes=-2", > new ByteArrayDeserializer(), new ByteArrayDeserializer()); > > > > I don't know if that little API improvement would be welcomed? I would be > able to send a Pull Request but I don't want to do it if that wouldn't > be welcomed in the first place: > > > Just an idea... let me know if that is welcomed or not. > > If so I can forward the discussion into how I would implement it. >