Thanks for the explanation.

SecurityProtocol was declared public in previous releases, hence I didn't
notice that it is internal.

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> For internal classes that are designed to be abstracted away from normal
> users, I think it is OK to not mention it in the upgrade guides.
>
> For developers rather than users of Kafka, they are assumed to be familiar
> with the codebase and not only rely on upgrade guide docs for such
> information.
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > bq. Internal classes which had previously been located in this package
> have
> > been moved elsewhere
> >
> > It would be clearer to Kafka users if the relocation of
> > org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.SecurityProtocol is mentioned
> explicitly.
> > Otherwise they need to dig into the code to find out.
> >
> > Just my two cents.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ted,
> > >
> > > I can found that we do have a corresponding doc change for this
> renaming:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3863/files#diff-
> > > 8100f2416b657c1e1e4238dabf8a15e0
> > >
> > > And from the web docs:
> > >
> > > http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc0/
> > > kafka_2.11-1.0.0-site-docs.tgz
> > >
> > > I can indeed find it in the upgrade.html.
> > >
> > >
> > > Guozhang
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Ted,
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking into this for possible doc changes now.
> > > >
> > > > Guozhang
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Looks like the following change is needed for some downstream
> project
> > to
> > > >> compile their code (which was using 0.11.0.1):
> > > >>
> > > >> -import org.apache.kafka.common.protocol.SecurityProtocol;
> > > >> +import org.apache.kafka.common.security.auth.SecurityProtocol;
> > > >>
> > > >> I took a look at docs/upgrade.html but didn't see any mentioning.
> > > >>
> > > >> Should this be documented ?
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 1.0.0.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > It's worth noting that starting in this version we are using a
> > > different
> > > >> > version protocol with three digits: *major.minor.bug-fix*
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Any and all testing is welcome, but the following areas are worth
> > > >> > highlighting:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 1. Client developers should verify that their clients can
> > > >> produce/consume
> > > >> > to/from 1.0.0 brokers (ideally with compressed and uncompressed
> > data).
> > > >> > 2. Performance and stress testing. Heroku and LinkedIn have helped
> > > with
> > > >> > this in the past (and issues have been found and fixed).
> > > >> > 3. End users can verify that their apps work correctly with the
> new
> > > >> > release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This is a major version release of Apache Kafka. It includes 29
> new
> > > >> KIPs.
> > > >> > See the release notes and release plan
> > > >> > (*https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> > > >> > action?pageId=71764913
> > > >> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?
> > > >> pageId=71764913
> > > >> > >*)
> > > >> > for more details. A few feature highlights:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > * Java 9 support with significantly faster TLS and CRC32C
> > > >> implementations
> > > >> > (KIP)
> > > >> > * JBOD improvements: disk failure only disables failed disk but
> not
> > > the
> > > >> > broker (KIP-112/KIP-113)
> > > >> > * Newly added metrics across all the modules (KIP-164, KIP-168,
> > > KIP-187,
> > > >> > KIP-188, KIP-196)
> > > >> > * Kafka Streams API improvements (KIP-120 / 130 / 138 / 150 / 160
> /
> > > >> 161),
> > > >> > and drop compatibility "Evolving" annotations
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Release notes for the 1.0.0 release:
> > > >> > *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc0/
> > RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > > >> > <http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc0/
> > RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > > >*
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > *** Please download, test and vote by Friday, October 13, 8pm PT
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > > >> > http://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> > > >> >
> > > >> > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> > > >> > *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc0/
> > > >> > <http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc0/>*
> > > >> >
> > > >> > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > * Javadoc:
> > > >> > *http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc0/javadoc/
> > > >> > <http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc0/javadoc/>*
> > > >> >
> > > >> > * Tag to be voted upon (off 1.0 branch) is the 1.0.0-rc0 tag:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kafka.git;a=tag;h=
> > > >> > 2f97bc6a9ee269bf90b019e50b4eeb43df2f1143
> > > >> >
> > > >> > * Documentation:
> > > >> > Note the documentation can't be pushed live due to changes that
> will
> > > >> not go
> > > >> > live until the release. You can manually verify by downloading
> > > >> > http://home.apache.org/~guozhang/kafka-1.0.0-rc0/
> > > >> > kafka_2.11-1.0.0-site-docs.tgz
> > > >> >
> > > >> > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 1.0.0 branch:
> > > >> > Unit/integration tests: https://builds.apache.org/job/
> > > >> kafka-1.0-jdk7/20/
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > /**************************************
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > -- Guozhang
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -- Guozhang
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -- Guozhang
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to